Practice interviews

What decision should this memo ask the CEO to make?

The CEO wants a recommendation on entering a new customer segment.

The question

Kestrel Workflows is a fictional US-based B2B software company. Use only this case packet.

Invented The source packet
  • Sales leadPlease announce the launch this month. Five customer interviews show mixed needs.
  • Engineering leadThe integration estimate has not been reviewed.
  • Project sponsorI assume Support can absorb the work; I have not checked with its lead.
Options today

The CEO can announce the launch, approve limited discovery, or decline the segment this quarter. The CEO has not committed to a launch.

“Choose your next move and explain the decision it supports.”

A strong answer, step by step

Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.

Step 1: Name the choice

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Ask for a bounded discovery decision

    The strong move. The current evidence does not establish readiness for a launch.

  • Write a long activity update

    Tempting, but it misses something. An update can describe the work without resolving the choice.

See how a strong candidate says it

“The memo should ask whether to approve limited discovery before committing to a launch.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The current evidence does not establish readiness for a launch.

Step 2: Make the recommendation usable

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Treat the sponsor’s support assumption as approval

    Tempting, but it misses something. The functional owner has not agreed it.

  • State the option, evidence and open assumptions

    The strong move. The memo connects an option to evidence and the unknowns it must resolve.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Recommend discovery, name the mixed customer needs and unreviewed integration estimate, and ask Support to check capacity.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The memo connects an option to evidence and the unknowns it must resolve.

Step 3: Update: Support says discovery uses staff needed for a fixed customer migration

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • Revise the discovery scope or timing

    The strong move. The new evidence changes whether the recommended option is feasible.

  • Keep the recommendation and add an appendix

    Tempting, but it misses something. The main recommendation would still rely on a failed assumption.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Move or narrow discovery after checking the migration constraint. Do not approve both on the same untested capacity assumption.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: The new evidence changes whether the recommended option is feasible.

Step 4: End with the decision request

What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.

  • End with “let me know your thoughts”

    Tempting, but it misses something. The executive must infer what decision you need.

  • Give a specific approval request and return point

    The strong move. A decision-ready memo says what approval releases and what happens next.

See how a strong candidate says it

“Ask the CEO to approve the revised discovery scope after the migration, with a named lead and a return date for a launch decision.”

What a strong candidate could say

Why it works: A decision-ready memo says what approval releases and what happens next.

The answer, in short

Decision
Seek approval for a feasible discovery plan before a launch commitment.
Because
Customer needs, integration effort and support capacity remain unresolved.
What would change it
Validated demand and an agreed delivery plan could support a launch decision.

Common traps

  • A polished update does not replace an agreed decision and owner.

Check your answer

  • I named the decision.
  • I separated evidence from assumptions.
  • I revised the option when capacity changed.
  • I ended with an owner and an ask.

Last reviewed Nov 10, 2026